The competitive strategy of Mao Zedong

I watched a movie alone early in the 90s, ‘The Last of the Mohicans.’ I think that Indian now lives without any presence after being unfairly deprived of their land and base even though many tribes disappeared. They took the United Kingdom and France sides, but as a result, they actually suffered the pain at a level of extermination of a tribe beyond the judgment of responsibility. This is a matter of judgment about how to go to which way.

 

If I ask all of the Korean and Chinese employees to do something, they should do something, whereas they need to do the other thing if I ask them to do the other thing. However it is not easy for me to do. I think it is really difficult to combine things into one. It seems not easy for various people to have one goal. The leadership of Jobs was really excellent? I don’t think so… I can say that he has a good sense.

I can’t judge him, but he seems to be a highly inventive character. The reason why Indians were ruined is because they were going the wrong way. They had several problems.

The leadership was a big matter, and they actually denied things necessary to accept, changes, and evolutions.

They might naturally die out even though they didn’t defeat the war against the white. They couldn’t have a dream of the reproduction for 1,000 or 10,000 years, but the tribe doesn’t reach a collapsed level if they had their own tactics, strategies, and a sense of goal.

 

In the past, they actually did so, but it wasn’t a big deal because any tactics and strategies were likely to be based on setting any goals. Several companies, such as Samsung, Apple Inc., and Sony, never thought that they would operate an electronics company. Samsung started as Cheil Industries Inc., store, cement, or rice mill?

According Porter, setting a goal, tactics, and strategies is a key sector in the competitive strategy.

He said, “A secret of the winner is ‘the competitive advantage (competitive),’ not ‘the comparative advantage.’

 

 The comparative advantage is decided by resources and visible things, whereas the competitive advantage is related to brand or invisible things. The competitive advantage depends on the competitive.”

This came from a book, ‘Understanding of the competitive strategy.’ After reading this book, I used several cases in the book on the spot. The key point of a problem is a lack of being considerate and being involved in. The biggest beneficiary for the competitive strategy is Mao Zedong.

He didn’t learn marketing, business, and economics, but how he combined each detail of tactics and strategies towards a goal?

 I am really surprised at his greatness. I think that he seems to have an eye for moving people’s heart even though he didn’t learn marketing while reading his biography. I posted his 16-word-strategy a few days ago.

“Step back when the enemy approaches, disturb when it stops, attack when it escapes, and chase when it steps back. (敵進我退, 敵停我擾, 敵避我攻, 敵退我追)" Mao Zedong was not born rich, and he also didn’t learn many things.

 

However, he had his own inventive way to win Chiang Kai-shek as the elite class. He seems to continue to seek something do the new discovery of a living when he was alive and after his death. He did a good thing and bad thing, but he got credit for his work in China.

So, he is still praised as the greatest person in China. I can’t say to forget a memorable thing, but at least judging him is just a corner of history?