A hostile partnership is better than a solitary genius?

 

200g of white craft / special color, gold and coating printing /

use of 350*2+2 angular paper / 2cm of golgi straps
 

The marketability of women fashion brands and casual brands has a high level of a sustainable potential to grow, but the children’s wear is also high.
We have already made six sorts of a shopping bag for the children’s clothing brands in Korea and China, so we can see product differentiation on designs between adults, teenagers, kids in harmony with color and glittering.
I always feel that there are wide variations in the brand’s value depending on a type of paper and strap.
I would like to bring a great deal of business and produce 1,000,000 pieces of a shopping bag every month.

I read a report for today lunch in the Korean version (online) of the Wall Street Journal, and its headline was ‘A hostile partnership is better than a solitary genius?’ This caught my eyes. According to a book, ‘The energy of two,’ two is better than one even though I am not sure whether it might because of its symbolism or not.
In my experience, it is not wrong when it is necessary to be creative and have a similar goal.
However, it’s not easy to do together because two has different goals and difference in work’s temperature.
Two might decide that it is good or bad as a result, but I think it’s not a good way for two to do something together.
I believe that doing alone doesn’t cause harm to others.
There are only few people who can understand my mind.
 
This is the proper flow that a person who liked and followed Ahn Cheol-soo and thought that it’s hard to dream of another ideal feels hurt about him and turns back to him.
Who throws a stone at the person? People who have ruled of Google together still go together because Google is the best company in the work. In fact, it might have been a bumpy ride if they had continued to eat Ramen, rice, and Ramen.

Anyway, if working together goes well, it’s really great. However, I have seen many cases that failed to successfully do business.
Thus, I am indisposed for doing so. China does so. There were three best friends.
One of them opened a restaurant and had many consumers coming there. So, three tried to be in partnership for a restaurant and ran larger-scale restaurant.
For three months, all of them went to the restaurant for serving, cooking, and welcoming consumers. However, as time went by, none of them appeared on.
They lost their own interests and passions towards the restaurant because they thought that someone went to a restaurant and worked.

After a few months, their business was in trouble, so it was closed within 6 months. They just pointed the finger at each other and never talked since then. This is just an example, but it’s not good to do a business with others. Even though we do something with other people, we would have only one thing left. This is distrust.

Therefore, if possible, it seems great to do a business alone.
There are only few successful cases to lead one’s business to success, such as Apple Inc. and Google.

On the other hand, we can easily see many of failed cases.
I just say why I was not confident of doing a business alone at that time over and over again.
It’s drizzling outside… It’s such a gloomy day.